I’ve started to respon few times already and I’ve somehow got distracted every time
I really wanted to repsond to this one well, because I really think it is important to many people.
Basic principles of the BLDC
Every BLDC motor has windings in its stator and permanent magnets in its rotor. Here is a quick graphic of a very simple 1 pole pair motor. This motor has three phases and each phase has one pair windings.
Once the current is passed through the winding coils the motor phases it induces a magnetic field in the windings with a polarity depending on the current polarity. In my figures I am going to simplify this effect and draw the coils in color red/blue - north/south as if they were magnets.
So whenever you apply certain current through the motor coils, they will generate the magntic field and the motor’s rotor will try to align with the coils magnetic filed. Here is an example of the motor behavior for two different initial positions by applying current in the phase a
From the graphic, and whats intuitive, you can see that regardless of the rotor’s intial position, when you set a certain magnetic field in the stator windings the motor will always try to align with that magnetic field, and in a case of this simple motor it will always some to the same position.
Definition of the field vectors
Now when talking about how to align different magnetic fields, what does it mean in practice and how do we characterise the force that actually makes the rotor move it is usual to introduce the field vectors. Basically the magnetic field vector by its length shows the strangth of the magnetic field and its direction will be determined going from the nort to south pole. It is very simple, here is a quick visualisation:
Now when we defined the vectors of the magnetic field based on the motor’s physics the force that turns the rotor of the motor depends of the strength of the two magnetic fields (
B_r - strength of rotor’s permanent magnets and
B_s - strength of the field in the coils produced by the current
I) and fields and the angle in between them
F ~ B_r*B_s*sin(theta)
F ~ B_r*I*sin(theta)
Basically this relationship means that the motor’s torque will be directly proportional to the two magnetic fields but also to the sine of the angle between them. And in particular as we cannot control the magnetic filed of the rotor’s magnets, we will have to control strength and orientation of the magnetic field vector of the stator windings (field oriented control).
Control of the field vector orientation (FOC)
From the force equation we can see that we can see that in order to use maximally our current and produce the maximal force we need to keep the angle in between the two vectors at 90 degrees, because
sin(90) = 1. In that case the force pushing the rotor to move ( creating the motor’s torque) will be proportional only to the current
F ~ B_r*I
Now to be able to keep the angle in between two magnetic fields fixed we first find the rotor’s angle in every time-step and then using this value we calculate what are the phase
c currents necessary to produce a the magnetic field vector
B_s that is exactly 90 degrees behind the rotor. In order to do that we use Park and Clarke transformations. We could go much deeper in this topic, if you’d be interested I’ll take some time to explain how we go from the vectors
B_s and the angle
theta to the
q coordinate system.
But the main takeaway is the that the
d axis is exactly aligned with the
B_r and the
q axis is 90 degrees from the
B_r. If we take the force equation and apply the current
d axis we get the magnetic field vectors
B_r that are aligned
F ~B_r*I_d*sin(0) = 0
And in the
q axis, we get the magnetic field vectors that have exactly 90 degree offset:
F~B_r*I_q*sin(90) = B_r*I_q
Which means if the
d axis and
q axis are defined in this way that any current applied in the
d axis will not produce any force to move the rotor or in other words any motor torque.
However, it is possible that in some implementations of the FOC some authors choose to defiend
q axis as the one aligned to the
d axis as 90 degrees apart from the
B_r and in that case
I_q does not generate any torque. But to my knowledge this is not the usual way.
One simpler variant of bldc motor control is trapezoidal control (or six-step) that is used very frequently in the ESCs; It can only turn on and off the motor phases and cannot finely tune the orientation of the magnetic field vector of the stator
B_s. This is how it works for a half of the electrical rotation.
As you can see the idea is very similar as the FOC (field oriented control) but the angle in between the vectors is not always kept at 90 degrees as we do using the FOC.
SimpleFOClibrary init procedure
In the init procedure we are searching to find the correspondance in between the 0 angle to the position sensor we are using and the electrical 0 angle of out motor which is usually defined by the magnetic field vector of the phase a. As shown on the second image and on the one below we could set the stators magnetic field orientation to -180 degrees and we will be sure that the motor will always align to the 0 electric angle.
Then we can just read the sensor value and add 90 degrees to it and use it as our target position to set out stator magnetic field vector
As we will be always adding the 90 degrees to our sensor angles, in literature many approaches (park + clarke) are defined not for the actual rotor position but for the rotor angle+90 degrees. instead of searching for the relationship in between the position sensor angle and the electric angle 0, we often search for electric angle 90. And in order to force the rotor to go to the 90 degrees, you need to apply the 90-180 = -90 or 270 degrees.
Here is an example:
Remembering the offset in between the position sensor angle and the rotor’s electrical 90 degrees angle avoids the need for adding the 90 degrees in the formulas, at least for the sinusoidal modulation. But the approaches of finding the 0 or 90 degree angles are equivalent, its a choice of implementation.
Limitations SimpleFOClibrary init procedure
This is a quiet standard procedure, and probably the most simple ones. But there are certainly limitations. The biggest downside is, as we are only doing one measurement it can happen that the rotor due to some physical imperfections (or sometimes just friction) does not go exactly to 90 degrees but some angle close to it. So in that case the force generated by the motor will not be 100 efficient becuase we will not be able to maintain
sin(90) = 1. This could be avoided by taking multiple measurements and doing some averaging or some more fancy statisctics.
The other downside of course is that if we do the calibration only once at the init, we are absolutely unaware if something happens in during the operation of your motor. If the sensor drifts, it could be potentially possible to account for the change in the alignment, but at the moment we do not implement such a feature.